This material is subjective in nature, does not constitute advertising and does not serve as a purchase guide. Before purchasing, consultation with a specialist is required.
Nikon is one of largest producers cameras and photographic equipment. Its assortment includes compact (“point-and-shoot” cameras), mirrored and mirrorless devices – and of various classes, from amateur to professional.
What to look for when choosing a camera
When choosing a camera, you should pay attention to the following parameters:
Lens type – integrated or interchangeable. The first option is only suitable for beginner photographers, while the second is for professionals;
Bayonet. This is the lens connection standard. Nikon usually uses a proprietary F mount, so almost any lens with this mount can be attached to its cameras (including both proprietary Nikkor series and those from third-party manufacturers);
Availability of a kit lens. It greatly simplifies life for beginner and amateur photographers. For professionals, body-only packages are suitable, without a lens included, since they allow you to customize the camera and its photographic qualities without overpaying;
The type of camera itself. A compact “soap box” is a solution only for beginners; ultrazoom - for those who like to shoot from a long distance, who are not ready to spend money on an expensive telephoto lens; mirrorless or DSLR camera – for professionals and “enthusiasts”;
Special characteristics. This could be the burst speed, the optical quality of the kit lens, the sensor resolution, or the type of autofocus - depending on the needs of the buyer.
If you plan to use the camera in a private studio (or "build a studio around the camera"), then it is also recommended to pay attention to the input and output interfaces for connecting peripheral equipment such as microphones, flashes or a remote shutter.
Types of Nikon cameras
There are the following types of Nikon cameras:
Compact, also popularly called “soap boxes”. The simplest solution for everyday shooting. They are usually equipped with non-removable telescopic lenses, have small sizes and medium technical specifications. But even this is enough for simple use: of course, you won’t be able to get studio-quality photographs, but you can take a few pictures for memory;
Ultrasounds. These are special cameras for photographing objects from a very long distance. They are equipped with an integrated lens with a huge zoom: for example, on the Nikon Coolpix P900 it is 83x optical and 166x including electronic. Such cameras use a special zoom mechanism, which provides such a strong “zoom”. And yes, you can use them to create a dolly zoom effect, although this will require training;
SLR (DSLR) cameras. One of the most common types of professional photographic equipment. They have a rather complex design, but are equipped with an optical pentaprismatic viewfinder. It is thanks to him that the photographer can observe the scene in real time with truly zero latency. However, during the actual shooting, the image in the viewfinder disappears to expose the frame;
Without SLR cameras. Used by both amateurs and professionals. They differ from mirror cameras in the simplicity of their design - the mirrors themselves and the pentaprismatic viewfinder are removed from it, and the frame is constantly exposed to the sensor. The viewfinder, in turn, in such cameras is electronic, so it may have millisecond delays before the image is displayed.
There are no differences in shooting quality (photo quality, etc.) between DSLR and mirrorless cameras. In both cases, once the shutter is pressed, the frame is directly and completely exposed on the sensor. But without DSLR cameras due to their simplified design, they are usually cheaper, thinner and lighter than SLR cameras - but the latter provide truly zero delay when displaying the image on the viewfinder.
Rating of the best Nikon cameras
| nomination | place | product name | price |
| The best amateur Nikon SLR cameras | 1 | 33500 rub. | |
| 2 | 55000 RUB. | ||
| 3 | 29900 RUB. | ||
| The best professional Nikon DSLR cameras | 1 | 87000 RUB. | |
| 2 | 185000 RUB. | ||
| 3 | 256000 RUB. | ||
| The best Nikon mirrorless camera with interchangeable lenses | 1 | 21900 RUB. | |
| The best Nikon compact cameras | 1 | - | |
|
|
- | ||
| Nikon's best rugged compact camera | 1 | 23700 RUB. | |
| The best Nikon ultrazooms | 1 | 32900 RUB. | |
| 2 | 25000 RUB. |
The best amateur Nikon SLR cameras
One of the best cameras for people who just want to take high-quality photos without bothering with settings, RAW and other exposure. However, the camera also supports all this. Therefore, those pictures that “out of the box” turned out to be of insufficient quality from a visual point of view can always be corrected in a graphics editor.
Other advantages include a rotating LCD display, a Wi-Fi module for instantly sending pictures to a connected smartphone or laptop, fast and quiet autofocus, good quality shooting in the dark.
Among the disadvantages, one can highlight the rapid drainage of the battery when using the LCD display as a viewfinder or when Wi-Fi distribution, lack of optical stabilization on the sensor, weak GPS and a body without dust and moisture protection.
The camera is sold in two configurations - with an 18-55 and 18-105 lens. The second one is recommended for purchase. However, the camera lens is interchangeable, the mount is standard – F.
Advantages
Ease of use, thanks to which nice pictures even novice photographers can do it;
Various delivery kits;
Many useful functions for working “on the go” - rotating screen, Wi-Fi, GPS;
Flaws
Low autonomy;
Optical stabilization only in the lens.
The main advantage of this camera is its focus mode. No matter the shooting conditions or scene, it delivers excellent sharpness and depth at the visual center of the frame. Focus quality is maintained in video mode.
The Nikon D7100 is also equipped with a new APS-C sensor without a low-pass filter, which provides natural colors and a wide dynamic range. The latter is especially important when shooting in RAW with subsequent image correction.
Among the disadvantages is the low quality of shooting in low light conditions. At ISO above 1000 there is noise in the image.
The camera is sold in two configurations – with an 18-105 and 18-140 lens. It is recommended to choose based on your wishes.
Advantages
Excellent autofocus for its price segment;
Great sensor with HDR support.
Flaws
- Suitable for shooting only in good lighting conditions.
Perhaps, best camera for beginners. Despite its limited functionality (fixed LCD display, no Wi-Fi, buffer for 3-5 RAW images), it is easy to set up, highly saturated and natural colors in the finished photos, lightweight and excellent portability for a DSLR. Separately, it is worth mentioning the quality of the sensor. When using an optimal (not kit) lens, you can get a “picture” that is not inferior to flagships.
True, it has slower autofocus than the D5300; no focus sealing; There is no bracketing and full HDR. In addition, it, like some other amateur Nikon DSLRs, begins to make noise at high ISO values, making it unsuitable for shooting in limited lighting conditions without a flash.
At the moment, only one configuration is available - with an 18-55 lens.
Advantages
Good sensor;
Small weight and dimensions.
Flaws
Slow and not always accurate autofocus;
Doesn't shoot well at high ISO values.
The best professional Nikon DSLR cameras
Full-frame camera with a powerful processor, which ensures continuous shooting at 6 fps at an actual resolution of 24 MP. It is equipped with a smooth and fast focusing system, a rotating screen, many preset shooting modes and scenes, a folding screen and a fairly large buffer. The most important advantage is that it is well suited for photography with high ISO values - noise is observed only after 6400.
Among the shortcomings, one can highlight only the presence of a low-pass filter on the sensor (but this is quite subjective), which leads to difficulties when shooting with HDR or in RAW for post-processing; weak Wi-Fi and minimum shutter speed of 1/4000.
Advantages
Easy to use;
Fast processor;
Large buffer;
Flaws
Low-pass filter on the sensor;
Minimum shutter speed 1/4000.
Full-frame camera with a powerful processor, large buffer and working ISO up to 25600 inclusive. The proprietary D4 matrix provides bright, rich, but natural colors while maintaining all shades. HDR support allows you to take dramatic photos. Convenient controls.
Disadvantages - there is no internal illumination of the focusing system, as a result of which autofocus may be “lost” in low-light conditions; no built-in flash; no focus peaking (contour alignment level).
It is important to note that this camera is designed for use with manual lenses. An automatic focus mode has been added “for show”. In particular, the mechanism was carried over from the older D600 model; it is not very fast and, as mentioned above, “gets lost” in the dark.
Advantages
Excellent sensor;
Powerful processor;
Wide range of working ICO;
Flaws
Not suitable for beginners;
Not the best best job autofocus in the dark.
A flagship camera with a powerful processor, fast and high-quality autofocus, working ISO up to 25600 and a huge number of settings for any shooting scenario. Very high speed shooting, even in RAW, excellent color rendition, rotating screen. However, this is a flagship camera, so all the necessary “professional” functions and qualities are in place.
There is essentially only one drawback. The camera uses the proprietary XQD memory card standard. And also drives and card readers for them are quite rare.
Advantages
Excellent sensor, powerful processor, large buffer;
Ergonomics.
Flaws
- Proprietary components, rare on the Russian market.
The best Nikon mirrorless camera with interchangeable lenses
Compact 1” mirrorless camera with Nikon 1 mount. Provides good quality photos thanks to a modern matrix with excellent color rendition. Convenient to use - equipped with a rotating touch LCD display, lightweight and small in size. Separately, it is worth mentioning the design, which imitates classic cameras.
Among the disadvantages is that it is not suitable for shooting long videos, and the maximum video frequency in 4K resolution is... 15 frames per second.
It is worth considering that the flash is built into the kit lens. Therefore, it will not be possible to use any overhead filters or polarizers. In addition, the camera simply does not have a hot shoe, so it is impossible to install an external flash.
Advantages
Convenient to use;
Good photographic quality;
Attractive design;
Flaws
Rare mount;
No hot shoe;
Poorly suited for video shooting;
The best Nikon compact cameras
Convenient and easy-to-use compact camera with an 8-megapixel sensor, optical stabilization in the lens, 3.5x optical zoom and support for preset shooting modes. The best solution, if you need “just a camera” for simple everyday photography.
Not suitable for video shooting due to the low resolution of the finished files. But it is compact, lightweight (200 grams assembled) and inexpensive.
Advantages
Compact and lightweight;
Preset shooting modes;
Easy to use;
Flaws
- Not suitable for video recording.
The main advantage of this camera is its excellent color rendition and sharpness for its price segment. When shooting in sunny weather, you get very “warm”, atmospheric and pleasant shots. In addition, it is very easy to operate, has a rugged and durable body, and also supports macro mode.
The disadvantage is that it’s better not to shoot a video.
Advantages
Excellent color rendition;
Easy to use;
Compact and lightweight;
Flaws
- Not suitable for video shooting.
Nikon's best rugged compact camera
A 16-megapixel camera that supports video recording in 4K resolution at 30 frames per second. It is performed in a protected housing that can withstand falls and shallow drownings. It features an LCD screen, fast and accurate focusing, ease of use, support for control from a smartphone and many preset modes.
There is only one drawback - the built-in battery has a low capacity. A fully charged one is enough for 300-350 shots without flash.
In addition, the camera is equipped with fairly accurate and fast (for its price segment) autofocus, as well as a sensor that provides natural and rich colors.
The disadvantages are a low-quality built-in microphone and a rather noisy zoom drive.
Advantages
Supports 4K 30 fps;
Good autofocus;
Time-lapse shooting mode;
Flaws
- Noisy zoom drive.
Which Nikon camera to buy
When choosing a Nikon camera, you should consider your intended use. If you just want to photograph “everyday life,” then you don’t need an amateur or professional camera at all; just a point-and-shoot camera will suffice. But if image quality is critical, then you should pay attention to the Nikon 1 J5 mirrorless camera.
For beginner photographers, amateur-level DSLRs are suitable. Perhaps the best of them is the Nikon D5300 with a lens included. It is equipped with a sufficient number of both preset modes and manual settings– so that you can form your own shooting style.
Then, having learned how to take photographs and developed your own style, you can purchase a professional-level DSLR. If you have a sufficient budget, the flagship model is recommended - Nikon D4s or Df. If you don’t have a six-figure sum for the camera, you can buy the B750.
But protected cameras and ultrazooms have a very specific area of use. The first ones are suitable for taking them with you on vacation; the second - for shooting distant objects or even astrophotography.
Previously, the principle of exclusive primacy reigned in the photography world - if you have a large, weighty DSLR in your hand, then you are a photographer. Everything else is a point-and-shoot camera for photographs. family album. Rangefinders stood apart. It is precisely this market that Canon and Nikon are accustomed to, releasing cool and reliable equipment.
But times are changing, and mirrorless cameras are slowly making their way to a place in the sun. And if at first the market leaders chuckled quietly, then over time they came to understand what huge part The market is going to competitors, and they have also introduced their own camera systems.
Today we’ll look at a representative of second-generation mirrorless cameras from Nikon. Nikon 1 V2.
Nikon 1 V2 video review:
Design and ergonomics
The device is just the right size to put in your pocket or small bag/purse/clutch/whatever and carry it with you always. At the same time, there is no feeling of fragility - if, in self-defense, you throw it at someone in a dark alley, you can cause significant HP damage. Magnesium alloy is used in production, so the tactile sensations are very, very good. Not in last resort thanks to the rubber coating that prevents slipping.
The ergonomics of the camera also deserves praise - despite its small dimensions, the camera fits into the hand like a glove, thanks to the strongly protruding handle. Although it looks much more organic in women’s neat hands, it is also suitable for men’s hands. There are few buttons and levers of all kinds, and most of them are small. But still, after a week of use you get used to it.
On the front side, except for the lens release button, nothing else can be found. No, you can - there are two stereo microphones right there. The right side is empty. On the bottom there is a tripod socket and a compartment for the battery and memory card.
On the left side are MiniHDMI, MiniUSB and a port for an external microphone. Which is good news.
The upper end is occupied by a flash and a button to open it, slightly shifted to the left side and a small speaker next to it. On the flash (decorative shaft of the pentaprism) there is a standard hot shoe. The right side is a little more loaded. There is a shutter button framed by an on/off ring, a video recording button and two wheels. One is responsible for selecting PASM modes, but in addition to all this, you can find an advanced video recording mode, an automatic mode, a mode for creating creative photos, and more. The second wheel is responsible for changing various parameters, and it has a secret. The thing is that this wheel is also a button responsible for selecting a parameter. You just need to press it, moving it forward, until it clicks.
The back side is the most capacious. Offset to the left is an optical viewfinder with a resolution of 1440 thousand dots, a proximity sensor and a diopter adjustment ring. The proximity sensor can operate in two modes: “Display fading, viewfinder on”, “Both display and viewfinder off; the latter turns on when brought to the eye.” This saves energy.
To the left of the screen there are four buttons, including viewing pictures, menu, Disp (analogous to Info) and deleting pictures.
To the right of the screen is a microscopic four-way joystick-wheel with an inscribed OK button. Various functions are hung here, but you will have to get used to the size. At the top is the Fn button.
The focus is on a three-inch display with a resolution of 921 thousand dots. It's not touch-sensitive or rotary, but it's bright enough to see what's going on or which menu item to select. By the way, it’s been reworked here and doesn’t resemble anything like that of its mirror counterparts.
I’ll say right away at this point that I didn’t like it.
The first thing you want to pay attention to is the power button. I'm used to using the system when you feel a click after a little effort. To understand, look at how the power wheels on Nikon DSLRs are organized. Immediately I was faced with the fact that the wheel moves back and forth without hindrance, while always returning to its original position. That is, he pulled it back, let it go, and the camera turned on. Same for turning off. Absolutely inconvenient, as you can easily turn on the device in your bag or pocket.
The second thing I would like to note is the completely useless flash mounting system. Although there is a button for opening, with a slight movement the flash is switched to operating mode. I don’t know about anyone, but I think that breaking it off in a backpack will be as easy as shelling pears. Although, maybe we came across a loose copy - write in the comments.
And thirdly, Nikon 1 V2 suffers from the same diseases as adult Nikons. Namely, peel-off rubber bands. I don’t know, maybe the workers should eventually send a batch of superglue to the plant?
And lastly, there is, in principle, enough space on the body to make the same joystick a little larger. Or add at least a couple of extra (no, they are far from superfluous) buttons. Although I'm already nitpicking.
What's inside?
Behind the lens, a one-inch CMOS sensor of only 14 MP is clearly visible. Although this value is enough to take excellent pictures. The processor inside is Expeed 3A. This is just a reworked third version. Although it is worth admitting that such a stone copes with the tasks with a bang. No lags or slowdowns were noticed either when browsing menus or photos, or when shooting and reviewing material. Recording occurs quickly - even after a series of 15 fps, a filled buffer of about 50 shots is written to the memory card in about a second or two, but you can continue shooting single shots immediately. We used a quick card (its review) to get these results.
Photosensitivity – from 160 to 6400 ISO. I personally am very pleased that Nikon decided not to show how many times they can amplify the signal and decided to stick with reasonable numbers.
You can shoot at all values, starting from 1600 in RAW. After proper processing, images with values above will be suitable anywhere - be it for the WEB or for printing, although not higher than A5.
The dynamic range is pleasing to the eye. You can even shoot difficultly lit scenes, and the owner will still receive a well-developed image with volume. If necessary, you can turn on D-Lightning, which will allow you to pull out more details, but if you want HDR, you will have to do everything manually - in one of the episodes of PhotoHack I will tell you how to do this.
I would also like to note the possibility of creating dynamic photos. It works something like this - you take a photo with the appropriate settings and the output is a second mov with sound (set in the settings, there are four types in total). I don't know who needs this.
Autofocus
The camera has a 71-point system that you can rely on completely. The focusing system will allow you to capture exactly the object you wanted. Even in low-light conditions, autofocus is fast and precise, keeping your main subject in sharp focus. By the way, this system even works in video, and exactly as needed. Now creating cinematic refocuses is as easy as shelling pears - you just need to point the camera at another subject.
Video capabilities
Videos are recorded in FullHD 60i/30p, HD – at 60p. It is possible to connect an external microphone and flexibly control the aperture and shutter speed in Live mode. But there is one small bug here - you can’t control the sound level according to a schedule (or am I looking wrong?), and there is no headphone output.
Shooting TimeLapse's, which have always distinguished the company, is also not available here - you will have to shoot by hand with subsequent processing.
But instead, it became possible to shoot sssuuuppppeeerrr-ssslllloooooo-mmmoooooushshnn - 400 fps at a resolution of 640 x 240 pixels and 1200 fps at 320 x 120. Such a video is shot for 3 seconds, the output is 16 and 48 seconds, respectively, at the frame rate 25/s. The opportunity is cool, but the quality is so terrible that it’s much better to shoot at 60p and slow down the image with various plugins in post. And the limitation of the minimum shutter speed of 1/1200s is not encouraging at all - it turns out that shooting can only be done in conditions of excellent lighting.
Fine
- Weight and dimensions.
- Ergonomics.
- Autofocus
- Image quality.
- Dynamic range.
- Serial shooting.
- Ability to record animated photos.
- Microphone port.
- Video recording quality.
- Slow Motion shooting.
Badly
- Price.
- Peel-off rubber bands.
- Inconvenient power button.
- Opening flash.
- No headphone output.
- No sound schedule.
- No Time Lapse Motion.
- Reduced customization options for images (HDR, filters, vignetting control, etc.).
Which glass to take
A universal, not too light lens will become an indispensable companion for every day as a whale lens. My opinion is that everyone should have glass in their case that they simply don’t mind. . The cost is about 200 dollars.
Essentially the same lens as above, only with a motor for smooth zooming during video shooting. Costs 100 bucks more.
Although its aperture is not amazing, this lens will be simply indispensable for those who cannot imagine their life without shooting reports and distant objects. Cost – 1000 dollars.
The bright wide-angle lens boasts that it is protected from various unfavorable conditions environment - it is waterproof, frost-resistant and shockproof. In general, exactly what you need when traveling. After all, a wide angle makes everything better. Price – 200 dollars.
This is a variation on the theme of a fast wide-angle without protective capabilities. Suitable for travel, but definitely not for extreme travel. Costs $250.
The rugged zoom was designed with the AW 1 in mind, making it a must-have for those who like to shoot in bad weather. In addition, a focal length of 30-70 mm equivalent can easily make it the main one on a body. Cost: $220.
A not-so-fast ultra-wide-angle zoom is an excellent choice for travel, architecture, or genre photography. It will cost the owner 500 bucks.
The focal length of this lens is approximately 50 mm equivalent. This means that a fast prime lens can easily fit on your camera, allowing you to shoot everything from architecture to general reporting. For only 200 bucks.
Super fast member of the 1 Nikkor lens family. This is a classic portrait lens with a focal length of approximately 85 mm equivalent. Shooting with it will give you beautiful blur. background and the ability to not worry about ISO or shutter speed even in poor lighting conditions. The cost is $900.
Alternative
Mirrorless camera with hybrid autofocus, 16 MP APS-C matrix, rotating touch display and Wi-Fi. Its cost is approximately $700. “Six” will be an excellent choice for those who love to travel light and prefer to have a large selection of optics, including those from third-party manufacturers.
Fuji X-E1
Canon's mirrorless camera boasts an 18 MP APS-C sensor, a port for an external microphone, and compact dimensions, but does not have a viewfinder. In addition, the display is not rotatable, so for non-standard angles you will have to try a little. The cost is about 550 dollars.
Camera with Micro 4/3 matrix size. There is a good design, a rotating display, a viewfinder, and just a cool matrix stabilization system that will smooth out hand tremors. However, there is no port for an external microphone. The camera costs approximately $850.
Another representative of Micro 4/3 cannot boast of ultra-compact dimensions - in appearance the camera resembles a small DSLR. But at the same time, there are a lot of advantages - a microphone input, a viewfinder, a three-axis rotatable touch screen, a huge number of mechanical control elements. The cost is approximately $750.
Experts believe that Nikon will have problems with this system only because it uses a 1-inch CX sensor, which is smaller than Micro Four Thirds. Consumers seem to be welcoming Nikon's mirrorless cameras with open arms. The fact is that Nikon 1 J1 provides excellent image quality. Very good high ISO performance. It's hard to tell the difference between the Olympus OM-D E-M5 and Nikon 1 J1 up to ISO 1600. At ISO 3200 and above, you can see that the J1 and V1 do a little worse, but they aren't too far behind.
The big question is, is there a barrier with the 1-inch CX sensor that Nikon can overcome to gain dominance in the mirrorless market? One of the main reasons why this market is booming is that consumers want to enjoy the benefits compact camera with a large sensor. That's the whole idea behind mirrorless cameras. interchangeable lens, first of all.
Nikon 1 J1 and V1 sensor vs Olympus OM-D E-M5 and PEN E-PL3 Micro Four Thirds sensor
Yes, Nikon uses smaller sensors in the 1 J1 and V1 cameras than Micro Four Thirds and much smaller than APS-C. Sure, this company may focus on making sleek cameras and lenses, but smaller sensor sizes will always give way to the superiority of larger sensor cameras. "Never" may not be the best word, but it's hard to imagine Nikon coming up with a revolutionary proprietary technology that makes their sensors better against larger sensors. Both Sony and Canon, in their pursuit of excellence, have favored APS-C sensor sizes with their mirrorless cameras.
The Nikon 1 mirrorless camera is indeed very compact. People who have had the pleasure of using Nikon cameras and lenses know that the reputation of these interchangeable lenses is a good reason to choose them, despite the various offerings from other mirrorless camera manufacturers.
Next, let's compare the sizes of the following cameras: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 Canon EOS M, Olympus PEN Mini E-PM1 vs Nikon 1 J1 and V1. You can see that the V1 is actually the largest in the group in terms of height, the Nikon 1 J1 is the smallest (the size is calculated without taking into account the retractable parts). Nikon 1 J1 is of course smaller than other cameras. The reason for this diminutive size is the lack of a viewfinder, which is provided by the V1.
Pentax Q vs Nikon 1 V1 and J1 - size comparison
In the picture above you can visually compare the Nikon 1 V1 and J1 with the Pentax Q, which uses a ½ 3-inch sensor, which is much smaller than the Nikon 1 J1. This is the main reason why Pentax failed with this model. Of course, after this the company released the Pentax K-01 with an APS-C sensor size. Pentax K-01 has gained an excellent reputation among competent specialists. As for the Pentax Q, this product may still be on the market for some time (about two years), but there are no prerequisites for bright prospects for this camera.
So Nikon has chosen a sensor size that falls somewhere in the middle. It's larger than the Q, but smaller than the Micro Four Thirds. One has to believe that Nikon engineers will have a technological opportunity in the future that will lead to the creation of new and exciting characteristics that will allow maximum benefits from using a smaller sensor. We've already seen 10fps to 50fps using the electric shutter. And that in itself only gives us a glimpse of what Nikon has planned for us in the future with the Nikon 1 camera.
techradar.com in their review of the Nikon 1 J1 wrote: “Image quality cannot compare with Micro Four Thirds cameras.” In contrast, CNET really liked the camera overall. You can find a lot of varied reviews and it seems that opinions about Nikon 1 are created mixed picture. Some people highly praise this camera in their reviews, while others focus on its shortcomings (lack of manual focus ring, slow sync flashes, in J1, small upper ISO range). The point is that some compromises had to be made in order to add new features that would actually be very useful.
Most of us probably won't be photographing at ISO 1600, and for this reason, it's better to use a smaller sensor that won't have any problems up to ISO 1600 (will improve over time), but in turn, the consumer will get new features that will be useful and pleasant. I think Nikon managed to achieve a compromise with the Nikon 1. So, understanding the needs of amateur photographers and technology enthusiasts, Nikon seems to have made a smart choice by offering a smaller sensor. This formula works as the product is selling successfully (so far).
Now, Canon has entered the market with its mirrorless EOS camera M. The interchangeable lens mirrorless market is becoming more saturated. Competition from cameras is also fierce mobile phones. A lot of money is spent in order to create new technologies in this market and stand out in the crowd. The second of the two main reasons why people choose MILC is the ability to use special interchangeable lenses.
If there was only one lens, there would be no reason to choose a MILC camera. Many would prefer a large compact fixed lens(for example, Sony RX100). Interchangeable lenses give photographers greater flexibility and more possibilities for creativity. You can use 1:1 macro lenses, telephoto zoom lenses, high quality very fast prime lenses and ultra-wide angle lenses. You can take photos that can't be captured with cell phone cameras, or you can shoot with a camera with a larger sensor but a fixed lens.
At the time of this writing, Nikon offers 4 Nikkor lenses: 10-30mm VR, 30-110mm VR, 10mm and 10-100mm VR. The 10-100mm VR PD-Zoom was designed specifically for video shooting (specialized lens). On at the moment, the choice is not particularly large, but Nikon plans to release new lenses in the near future. Nikon is famous for the quality of its optics. We are confident that all new lenses will demonstrate optical quality at the highest level (at least we hope).
Who caught Soviet Union remembers what a “scarce product” is. At that time, almost everything was in short supply: furniture, household appliances, good books, products. When they bought something in short supply, they even said: “I didn’t buy it, but I got it.” Currently, there is another problem - the problem of choice.
Which smartphone to buy: Apple, Samsung or Sony; car: Toyota, Wolkswaggen or maybe Chevrolet. And, of course, which camera is better – Nikon or Canon. 🙂 And how many product modifications there are in the line of a particular brand. Try to choose.
Someone turns to sales assistants in the store for help. And someone surfs the Internet, studying reviews of products of interest. I belong to the second category. Firstly, I am fascinated by the selection process itself, and secondly, sales consultants are often incompetent, especially in large shopping centers.
A little more than a year We published an article ago. We wrote that the Nikon D5000 suits us quite well and that we are not going to buy a new camera. But, unexpectedly, it failed. IN service center They said that there was a high probability of the central board breaking. And in this case, repairs become impractical due to the very high cost. And the question arose - what model of camera should I buy?
A few years ago, the answer would have been clear - a cropped Nikon SLR camera of the five thousandth (D5xxx) or seven thousandth (D7xxx) series. Today, the choice is not so simple. Firstly, on secondary market You can find full-frame D600 and D610 models in good condition for a reasonable price. I came across advertisements for saleNikonD600 for $800 andNikon D610 - for $1000, and the mileage of these devices did not exceed 10,000 frames, and outwardly they looked like new. And this is comparable in price to cropped modelsD7100, D7200 in stores in our city. Secondly, mirrorless cameras have caught up with SLR cameras in their capabilities, characteristics and ergonomics, and in some ways they have surpassed them.
The reasoning presented below is solely my personal opinion, based on reading a number of reviews and using some camera models.
Choosing a SLR Camera
- Brand
Everything is simple with the brand. I have been a Nikon fan for over five years now. I am satisfied with everything: ergonomics, intuitive menu and, of course, the quality of the pictures. When using high-aperture optics and certain camera settings, you can obtain JPEG files of excellent quality that require virtually no processing. You can find out more about this. Plus, I acquired, albeit a small, fleet of lenses, which will have to be changed when switching to another system (Canon, Pentax or Sony).
- Model
Choosing a specific model is a more difficult task. I considered the following options for purchase: D5200, D5300, D5500, D7100, D7200 - with an APS-C format matrix (crop factor 1.5 - the matrix area is 1.5 times smaller than that of full-frame cameras) and D600, D610 - cameras with a full-frame matrix. I didn’t want to buy the Nikon D3200 and D3300 because of their limited functionality (only 11 focusing points with one cross-shaped one, no exposure bracketing, no time-lapse shooting function, etc.) Cameras in model range higher than Nikon D610 were not considered due to high cost. I also didn’t want to buy a camera older than 2012. Technological progress does not stand still. New cameras are equipped with more advanced matrices, processors, autofocus modules, and become lighter and more convenient to operate.
Of course, Nikon D610 is a favorite among the cameras listed. A full-frame 24-megapixel sensor, which, according to the DxOmark website, allows you to shoot with virtually no noise up to ISO values of 3000 units. While for other cameras under review this figure is approximately 1300 units, with the exception of Nikon D600. "Six hundred" in its characteristics is not much different from the D610. But many photographers who bought this camera complained about droplets of oil and small particles from the shutter that appeared on the sensor over time. Nikon recognized the problem, and a year later released a replacement - Nikon D610, practically the same camera, but with a new shutter mechanism, which also increased the continuous shooting speed from 5 to 6 frames per second.
Users of full-frame cameras claim that their cameras produce images with smoother tonal transitions, different geometry, and to a greater extent blur (bokeh). My eye does not see differences in tonal transitions and geometry in photographs taken on full-frame cameras and cameras with an APS-C matrix. And I’m quite happy with the degree of blur on matrices with a 1.5 crop. Therefore, the only important difference remains - the ability to shoot at high ISO values with little noise.
But at the same time, the Nikon D610 has a number of disadvantages that are significant for me. The heavy weight of the camera itself (850 grams versus, for example, 470 for the Nikon D5500), the greater weight and price of lenses designed for devices with a full-frame matrix. On the bus tour “Royal Lights of Benelux”, I carried around my neck for 11 days from early morning until late eveningNikonD5000 (560 grams) with lensNikkor 18-105mm (450 grams). And at the end of the trip my neck said: “Enough! I'm tired! Don’t even think about buying heavy cameras in the future!” 🙂
Another disadvantage is that the focus points in the Nikon D610 cover a much smaller part of the frame than in the D5200, D5300, D5500, D7100 and D7200. This is not critical, but it is not convenient. When manually selecting focus points, you will often have to recompose the frame (you focus on one of the points, most often the central one, press the shutter button halfway, recompose the frame, press the shutter and take a photo). Lastly, the D610 doesn't have a rotating screen. Some will say, “That’s not a negative,” but I’m used to the convenience that a rotating screen provides—the ability to shoot from a low point without lying on the ground, and with your arms outstretched, seeing what you’re shooting (controlling the frame). The D750, one of the latest full-frame cameras released by Nikon, does not have these disadvantages (except weight). But the price of $2000 for a new model and $1500 on the secondary market is daunting.
Despite all of the above, the Nikon D610 is an excellent camera that allows you to take beautiful photos in almost any shooting conditions. For those who are buying their first DSLR with a full-frame sensor, this is an excellent choice.
The D5200, D5300, D5500, D7100 and D7200 models, in my opinion, produce images of the same quality. Of course, the seven thousandth series is more advanced compared to the five thousandth. This includes a larger number of control elements (buttons and wheels) on the camera body, an additional monochrome screen for controlling shooting parameters, dust and moisture protection of the body, more advanced autofocus with 51 focusing points (15 of them cross-shaped) versus 39 points (9 cross-shaped), the best viewfinder, two slots for memory cards, a built-in motor (“screwdriver”) that allows you to fully use lenses without a focusing motor, advanced work with external flashes. But the weight is greater - 765 grams, and the price. The new Nikon D7100 Body costs $900, Nikon D7200 Body – $1100. On the secondary market, for an “unkilled” D7100 they ask for $600-650, for a D7200 – $800-850, at least in our area. If you are going to carry a heavy camera, then a full-frame one, especially since its cost is not much more expensive. I would choose a used D610 over a D7100 or D7200.
But, since one of the determining factors is weight, I am still inclined to the five thousandth series. Moreover, I can do without an additional display and a slot for memory cards, I don’t use it much external flashes, and all my lenses have a built-in focusing motor. Dust and moisture protection is a useful option, especially for travel enthusiasts. But we must not forget that the lenses used must be dust- and moisture-proof. And this, as I understand it, only applies to top-end lenses with a high cost.
In the Nikon D5000, I lacked a separate button for switching focus areas (automatic selection of focus points or focusing on a selected point) and an additional wheel for quickly changing ISO. But in the D5200, D5300 and D5500 the situation has changed. Firstly, the Auto-ISO function appeared. Now there is no need to constantly monitor the sensitivity value, just set the upper threshold or range - the minimum and maximum ISO values and the camera itself will select the required shutter speed or aperture values (depending on what mode you are shooting in). I use aperture priority mode more often than others, and one control wheel will be enough for me to change the aperture value. Secondly, switching focus areas can be set to a separate button; the Nikon D5000 did not have this option. That is, in the new models of the five thousandth series, I can control all the shooting parameters I need without taking my eyes off the viewfinder and without delving into the menu.
From D5200, D5300 and D5500, I would choose golden mean– D5300. On the one hand, it is superior to the D5200 in a number of parameters - a new processor, the presence of built-in GPS and Wi-Fi modules, a display with a larger diagonal and less weight. On the other hand, the D5500 differs from the D5300 only in the presence of a touch screen, slightly lighter weight and a slightly improved battery. The new Nikon D5200 Body costs $500, the D5300 costs $550, and the D5500 costs $750. On the secondary market you can buy a D5200 for about $300, a D5300 for $400, and a D5500 for $600-650. For this money you can find a camera with a low mileage, 4000-6000 frames, and often even with a Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 kit lens included.
To summarize, when it comes to SLR cameras, I am inclined to buy the Nikon D5300. But I find myself thinking that I would like a full-frame Nikon D750. Maybe there is still some kind of magic in cameras with a full-frame matrix.
Choosing a mirrorless (system) camera
- Brand
There are about ten manufacturers represented on the mirrorless, or as they are also called, system cameras market. But I think it makes sense to only consider Panasonic, Olympus, Sony and FujiFilm. It is the listed companies that set the tone in this market segment, constantly releasing new, more advanced models of cameras, optics and various accessories for them.
From the title of the article it should be clear that I chose FujiFilm cameras and here's why. Olympus and Lumix cameras (manufactured by Panasonic) are equipped with Micro 4/3 format matrices; they are also called double-crop, since the matrix area is half that of full-frame models. Small sensor means more noise at high ISO values. Indeed, DxOmark publishes data that the working ISO of these cameras is within 900 units. IN lately For me, the main subject of photography is my growing daughter. And since a child is a perpetual motion machine and a jumper, in order to get a sharp shot, you have to shoot at shutter speeds no longer than 1/200 of a second. We often walk in the evening. And to get such a shutter speed, even with open apertures, you have to raise the ISO to 1600 units and higher. At these values, Olympus and Lumix cameras begin to develop color noise, which is difficult to combat at the post-processing stage.
Sony is developing two directions in the system camera segment: a line with an APS-C matrix - A3xxx, A5xxx, A6xxx and a line of full-frame cameras - A7. A3xxx are ultra-budget cameras, the size and weight of which are comparable to entry-level SLR cameras. Essentially a mirrorless camera in a DSLR body. A pointless purchase for those who want to switch to mirrorless cameras due to their size and weight advantages.
A5xxx and A6xxx – good models, which replaced the rather successful NEX series. But for me personally they are not easy to use. And we are not talking about a small number of control elements on the body. This is exactly all right. The overall ergonomics of these cameras is such that they feel like a foreign element in my hands. And if the device is inconvenient to use, you don’t want to buy it.
Full-frame Sony A7s, on the contrary, fit like a glove in the hand, they have excellent weight for full-frame cameras (up to 500 g) and excellent image quality. But very expensive optics. For example, the Sony 24-70mm f/4 standard zoom lens, which is not the fastest, costs $1,000, the Sony 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 telephoto lens costs $1,500, and these are far from the most expensive options. Buy a camera for $1,500 and pay three times more for required lenses I don't want to at all.
That leaves Fujifilm.
- Model
This manufacturer has two models that interested me - the X-T10 and X-T1, the prices of which with the Fujinon 18-55mm f/2.8-4 lens are $1000 and $1500, respectively. I also like the new flagship X-T2, but I don’t like its price - about $2000 for the camera without lens. What attracted me to it? Fujifilm cameras? Ergonomics (fit perfectly in the hand, a lot of control elements on the body), a large viewfinder that is really convenient to use, the presence of a folding screen, a very good in-camera JPEG with built-in film profiles.
There is no data on the matrix characteristics of these cameras on DxOmark. This is probably due to the fact that Fuji, when producing X-series cameras, used not standard Bayer sensors, but proprietary matrices made using X-Trans CMOS technology (crop factor 1.5). But, on the dpreview website for most modern cameras it is possible to evaluate the noise level at various ISO values. In my opinion, when compared with Nikon cameras, the working ISO of the Fujifilm X-T10 and X-T1 is in the range between models with cropped matrices D5xxx, D7xxx and full-frame D610, and closer to the latter.
The optics of the X series cameras are also fine. To date, more than two dozen lenses have been released for the Fujifilm X-Mount mount (there are only three standard zoom lenses: Fujinon 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6, 18-55mm f/2.8-4 and 16-55mm f/2.8) . Among them there are both budget options, for example, a telephoto lens Fujinon XC 50-230mm f/4.5-6.7 for $300, and fast dust-proof and splash-proof lenses - Fujinon XF WR 50-140mm f/2.8 - $1500. Moreover, according to reviews, even inexpensive lenses allow you to take pictures of excellent quality.
Of the relatively new cameras equipped with a viewfinder, at a reasonable price, there is also the X-E2 and its modification, the X-E2s ($1000 with a Fujinon 18-55mm f/2.8-4 lens and $800 with a Fujinon 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 ). The quality of photos obtained from these cameras will be the same as that of the X-T1 and X-T10. All four models have the same matrix and processor. But, X-E2 and X-E2s remind me Sony cameras A5xxx and A6xxx. In addition, compared to the X-T1 and X-T10, they have a small viewfinder, lack a rotating screen, and do not fit as comfortably in the hand.
If you choose between T1 and T10, “one” is better for a man’s hand. The T10 is a bit small for me personally and it’s not that comfortable to drive. The differences are as follows: the X-T10 does not have dust and moisture protection, is equipped with a smaller viewfinder (albeit with the same 2.36 megapixel resolution), and does not support high-speed SD UHS II memory cards. Another disadvantage is the smaller buffer capacity, which imposes limitations when shooting continuously. But, again, the image quality of these cameras is the same.
So, most likely, my choice is the Fujifilm X-T10. And the difference of $500 is better spent on optics. As an option, you can consider buying a used X-T1. But, on our peninsula, a used “unit” is a rare visitor, and it’s scary to buy through shipping, you don’t know in what condition they will be sent.
Just the other day the companyFujifilm released a new cameraX— T20 with the same matrix and processor as the flagshipX— T2, but slightly reduced in functionality. Its cost with lensFujinon 18-55 mm f/2.8-4 is about $1300. A good option - practically a flagship, only in a smaller case, without dust and moisture protection and a number of other points. But allowing you to get quality photosX— T2.
DSLR or mirrorless – Nikon vs. FujiFilm
By and large, the only thing that doesn’t suit me about DSLR cameras is the weight. As mentioned above, even the weight of younger models in conjunction with some lenses is more than a kilogram. And if you take a full-frame camera and several lenses, then such a system can weigh up to several kilograms. The greater weight of the camera and lens means you need a strong, stable tripod - that's a couple more kilograms.
The comparison section could have ended here, but I decided to make a list positive qualities each of the systems – mirrored and mirrorless.
- Pros of a DSLR camera
Dimensions. Personally, I find it much more convenient to use a DSLR camera. It is more grippy and balanced even when using large lenses. And some mirrorless cameras paired with a telephoto lens resemble a smartphone with a spotting scope glued to it. It looks strange and is extremely inconvenient to use.
A large number of optics and accessories. Due to the fact that DSLRs have been on the market much longer than mirrorless ones, there are more different accessories and optics for them. This is due not only to companies that directly produce DSLRs - Nikon, Canon, Pentax, Sony, but also to third-party manufacturers - Tamron, Tokina, Samyang and a number of others.
Lower system cost. This primarily concerns the amateur segment, because professional Nikon and Canon cameras cost the same as an inexpensive foreign car. But, if you compare, for example, lenses for cropped cameras, it turns out that SLR systems are cheaper. The new Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX costs $200, and the Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 WR costs $400; Nikon 50mm f/1.8G AF-S DX again $200, faster Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S – $400, Fuji – Fujinon XF 50mm f/2 WR – $500 and Fujinon XF 56mm f/1.2 for $1100. It should be noted here that Fujinon lenses with the WR mark are dust and waterproof, and 56mm is super-fast. But such moments are of interest primarily to professionals. In the secondary market there is generally freedom for owners of mirror systems. You can buy a “fifty kopeck” for $100, a fast zoom like Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 for $150, and, for example, a good kit - Nikon D7000 with a Nikon 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 lens for only $400 (or something similar from Canon).
Optical viewfinder. The main advantage of the optical viewfinder (OVF) is that when using it the human eye does not have to readjust, it is always comfortable. The electronic viewfinder (EVF) of mirrorless cameras is essentially a small TV. The brightness of its picture may differ from what it actually is. In this case, the eye will need to adapt to new conditions each time in order to begin to confidently see what may cause discomfort. In addition, some photographers claim that if you use the electronic viewfinder for a long time, the second eye (which is closed) begins to see poorly and cannot focus for some time. Also, EVI is not very convenient for continuous shooting. If in JVI, the photographer always sees what is happening in the frame and can constantly keep the subject in the right point, then the electronic viewfinder, after the picture is taken, shows a black screen for a couple of moments. During this time, the subject may move and the next shot will not work.
Separate phase focus sensors. Thanks to this, today's SLR cameras are still better at focusing in tracking mode. Children and animals playing, sporting events, wedding report– it’s better to shoot all these scenes in tracking mode.
- Pros of a mirrorless (system) camera
Compactness of the system (weight and dimensions). One of the main advantages of mirrorless cameras, at least for me personally, is their weight. For example, a Nikon D7100 with a Sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4 lens weighs 1 kilogram 300 grams, and a Fujifilm X-T10 with a Fujinon 18-55mm f/2.8-4 weighs 700 grams. And these, in my opinion, are cameras of the same level. And, of course, compactness. I often want to take a small camera with me. They don't pay so much attention to it, i.e. you can take photographs where, with a big black SLR, you will most likely be kicked out. You can take more lenses, etc.
Modern optics. Mirrorless cameras have recently appeared on the market. And since they are structurally different from SLR lenses, engineers had to develop new lenses for them. The optics were created specifically for matrices with a large number megapixels. While a number of lenses used on SLR cameras were released quite a long time ago, for matrices with a resolution of 6-12 megapixels, and not 24 and higher, like many modern cameras. Because of this, as a rule, only the central part of the photo turns out sharp. Modern optics of mirrorless cameras allow you to take photographs with uniform sharpness across the entire field of the frame.
Lack of back focus, front focus. Again due to design features, on mirrorless cameras there are no problems with back and front focus, i.e. when the lens focuses not on the subject, but behind or in front of it. This is a fairly common problem with SLR cameras, especially when third-party optics are used.
Electronic viewfinder. The undoubted advantage of EVI is that the photographer sees in it end result. Those. if the frame is overexposed (too light) or underexposed (too dark), this is immediately visible, and you can quickly make the necessary exposure compensation. In addition, EVI allows you to enlarge the picture so that you can accurately determine the degree of sharpness of the future photograph.
Mirrorless cameras are better. Or, at a minimum, they have a number of functions that their mirror counterparts lack. This is also the ability to focus across the entire field of the frame, and not just in the central zone. And various assistant functions for working with non-autofocus optics - focus picking, focusing wedges. Silent shooting, shutter speed up to 1/32000 second inclusive and a number of other advantages.
At the heart of mirrorless technology is the electronic viewfinder. Its use allows you to reduce the size of the camera compared to SLR cameras, while maintaining advanced functionality and interchangeable optics.
The first mirrorless cameras, which appeared in the early 2000s, were not in demand due to their high cost and limited capabilities. But in recent years the situation has changed. Technical Parameters modern models comparable to DSLRs and second only to professional equipment. But the mass distribution of mirrorless cameras is hampered by the high cost and underdeveloped optics fleet. The use of adapters and non-native lenses often leads to a decrease in quality.
Mirrorless technologies are being actively developed by all photographic equipment manufacturers, including the leaders of the “mirror” market Canon and Nikon, but so far their successes in the new field cannot be called outstanding. The palm here belongs to Olympus and Panasonic, but in recent years Sony has become the generally recognized leader.
Mirrorless cameras are confidently conquering the market and may eventually displace DSLR cameras. However, novelty is a limiting factor in increasing sales. Even sellers in specialized stores are not always ready to provide competent consultation. Therefore, when choosing, it is advisable to focus on reviews, reviews and ratings of the best mirrorless cameras.
The best mirrorless cameras for hobbyists
3 Canon EOS M50 Kit
A model that is not picky about consumables. Focusing by eyes
Country: Japan
Average price: 44990 rub.
Rating (2019): 4.6
Mirrorless with best characteristics, if we take into account the loyal price of the gadget. There are interchangeable optics, a three-inch rotating display, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, a 25.8 megapixel matrix and 4K support. In the reviews, the owners of this mirrorless camera swear that 4K is dishonest, but even in Full HD the M50 shoots amazingly.
Users, after using this model for more than six months, share their observations in reviews. Autofocus is great: there is tracking focus, eye focus, and the ability to select the focus point by tapping on the screen when using the electronic viewfinder. Thanks to a cheap Chinese adapter you can connect a 50 mm STM lens. The camera also accepts cheap batteries without problems. I’m also pleased with the flexibility of the menu and the many settings. All buttons can be reassigned. This is the best mirrorless camera for amateurs and not only.
2 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II Kit
Optimal value for money. Optical stabilizer
Country: Japan
Average price: 39,990 rub.
Rating (2019): 4.7
Behind the retro style lies an advanced electronic filling. The advantages of the camera include a large electronic viewfinder, high sensitivity, good color rendition and fast autofocus. The new version has a useful option on the rotating touch screen: selecting a focus area with your finger across the screen.
But what makes the OM-D E-M10 Mark II the best among its competitors is the built-in 5-axis optical stabilizer, which not all older models have. With it you can confidently shoot handheld at long shutter speeds in low light and record video.
There are no complaints about the picture resolution in video mode; the maximum video frequency is 120 frames. The rate of fire is also high. 8.5 frames per second is enough for professional reportage photography. The buffer is not rubber, but spacious: the maximum series of images is 22 in RAW format. Among the disadvantages, users note the illogical menu, but you can get used to it.
1 Sony Alpha ILCE-6000 Kit
The most popular mirrorless camera
Country: Japan
Average price: RUB 39,490.
Rating (2019): 4.8
Despite its compact size, this mirrorless camera will give odds to most amateur DSLRs. Main competitive advantage – best speed autofocus A record 179 points provide full frame coverage; Sony can easily cope with any dynamic scenes. The impressive shooting speed of 11 frames per second will not let reporters down.
Tenacious tracking autofocus could make the model a leader in video quality. Full HD resolution and recording speed meet modern requirements, but the manufacturer decided not to focus on video. There is no microphone jack on the body, and users complain about the camera overheating during prolonged continuous use.
An indisputable advantage of the Sony Alpha ILCE-6000 is also its low noise level. ISO up to 3200 is rated as working, and 6400 is guaranteed to be suitable for a home album. Other useful features include Wi-Fi, NFC and a rotating screen.
The only drawback of a mirrorless camera is the cost, which beginner photographers will find unreasonably high.
The best mirrorless cameras for advanced users
3 Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 Kit
Best for Videography
Country: Japan
Average price: 43309 rub.
Rating (2019): 4.5
A mirrorless camera that takes mediocre photos and great videos. It has a 16-megapixel matrix, the ability to record video for up to 30 minutes in 4K resolution, an electronic viewfinder, a rotating touch screen and fast tracking autofocus. Reviews call this model the best inexpensive solution for videographers.
The software includes a variety of video assistants. There are many settings. The built-in microphone does its job perfectly. Its light weight and sleek dimensions make it the best choice for advanced users looking for a camera for 4K video shooting and more. Bonuses: powerful battery, good sound recording, excellent detail in video. The main drawback is that the body materials are not of the highest quality. The plastic looks flimsy.
2 Sony Alpha ILCE-7S Body
Full frame camera
Country: Japan
Average price: 97385 rub.
Rating (2019): 4.7
The release of the full-frame Sony Alpha A7s became a technological breakthrough in the world digital photography. By increasing the pixel size, the manufacturer has achieved previously unimaginable sensitivity. During daylight hours this solution does not provide any benefits, but in the dark Sony shows incredible results. Experts agree that when ISO is set to 6400, the use of noise reduction is not required. Wide dynamic range allows you to capture details even in complete darkness. Other advantages include a metal case, a folding display and Wi-Fi.
The mirrorless camera has impressive video potential. Contrast focusing does not lose autofocus even if the subject is constantly moving. All settings are adjusted during shooting. The frame rate of the video reaches 120 frames per second, and when connecting an external recorder, recording in 4K format is possible.
The main complaint against Sony is its weak battery. When traveling and shooting for long periods of time, you will need several spare units. In addition, the mirrorless camera has a low rate of fire: 5 frames per second is not enough for reporters, but the manufacturer set itself other goals.
A mirrorless camera is best for shooting in low light conditions. Of course, it has some shortcomings that the second version released eliminates, but the cost of the new model is disproportionately higher.
1 Sony Alpha ILCE-6500 Kit
High-quality 5-axis image stabilization
Country: Japan
Average price: 92102 rub.
Rating (2019): 4.9
A neat mirrorless camera with excellent capabilities and compact dimensions. This Alpha shoots in 4K resolution, has a 25-megapixel camera, a flip-up touch screen and supports interchangeable lenses. 5-axis stabilization works well. Autofocus pleases not only with its clarity, but also with its speed of response - the manufacturer calls the autofocus in its creation the fastest in the world. There are many phase focusing points - 425 pieces.
The reviews write a lot of nice things about this mirrorless camera. There are also complaints: about a weak battery, about the focus not always working correctly on “non-native” lenses, about low speed recording via USB. Users note that the gadget hardly heats up, pleases with its ergonomics and light weight, and is distinguished by high-quality stabilization. The kit includes a kit lens, so no additional investment is needed to start taking photographs.
The best mirrorless cameras for professionals
4 Sony Alpha ILCE-7M3 Body
Image quality
Country: Japan
Average price: 141,990 rub.
Rating (2019): 4.7
24 megapixel full-frame matrix, producing photos in a resolution of 6000x4000. The autofocus is hybrid and pleases with its speed, large number of points, tracking function and “smart” operation when shooting portraits. There are headphone, microphone and USB Type-C connectors, as well as support for two flash cards at once. The screen only rotates up and down, which is convenient when shooting from the stomach, for example, but vertical photos from above will have to be taken blindly. But you can specify focus points directly on the screen: the system will understand you.
Electronic viewfinder with 100% field of view. The battery is quite capacious - it is enough for 510 photos, although in burst mode the Alpha ILCE-7M3 is capable of producing several thousand frames on a single charge. User reviews note that the camera can withstand more than a 5-hour interval in active mode without recharging.
3 Fujifilm X-T20 Body
Best price
Country: Japan
Average price: 49990 rub.
Rating (2019): 4.7
Compact universal version of Japanese quality. The device is great for both video and photography. professional quality. There is a 24-megapixel matrix that creates 4K video content without cropping. The screen is touch-sensitive and rotatable, the diagonal size is three inches. I'm glad that the camera does not overheat even when recording video in ultra format.
Despite its touching dimensions, the camera is capable of delivering great picture with excellent quality. It's a pity that there is no function for changing ISO when recording video. Otherwise, this is a professional mirrorless camera with interchangeable lenses, encrypted as a budget compact camera. The camera made it to the top of the best cameras not only due to its reasonable price, but also due to the surprisingly high quality of the footage.
2 Sony Alpha ILCE-A7R III Body
Dual memory card support
Country: Japan
Average price: 189,400 rub.
Rating (2019): 4.8
The compact professional version with a 44 MP matrix and support for 4K video also made it to the top. Autofocus performs its function properly even in the twilight. When shooting portraits, autofocus focuses on the eyes - convenient. Matrix stabilization is a great help when filming. The viewfinder is electronic and of high quality. The processor is powerful and even while saving the captured frame, it leaves the user the opportunity to change settings and navigate the menu.
The menu, unfortunately, is very overloaded - in the labyrinth of settings it is difficult to quickly navigate and get to the desired characteristics. But even in poor lighting, the photos do not blur and are characterized by high quality. Another nice bonus for wedding and “reportage” photographers – high shooting speed. Up to 10 frames are created per second. Every megapixel of the matrix is felt and expressed in the quality of the pictures. The body is nice, the wheels are metal, the button travel is tight, so you can feel every press. The shutter button is smooth.
1 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Kit
High resolution images. Operation speed
Country: Japan
Average price: RUB 189,898.
Rating (2019): 4.9
A mirrorless, compact option for those who specialize in photography professional level. There is a 20-megapixel camera that shoots in a resolution of 5184 x 3888, an electronic viewfinder, and a touch-sensitive rotating LCD display. Autofocus is hybrid and works quickly, correctly and accurately. The number of focusing points is amazing - 121. There is manual focusing and even an electronic rangefinder.
The body is made of metal and is protected from dust and water. The gadget fits perfectly in the hand, providing a comfortable grip with a well-thought-out body shape. Auto ISO is programmable, which allows you to get a high-quality frame without noise. The detail is amazing, especially in RAW format. White balance in automatic mode works well - color rendition is natural. For portraits and reportage photos, this is the optimal model considering price and quality. In addition, there is excellent stabilization, fast operation (from switching on to frame processing) and tenacious focus with a tracking function.
Loading...
