With the advent of the digital age, the world of photography has changed dramatically. Just a few years ago, we all actively took photographs and ran to the darkroom to print our photographs. A little later, we began printing pictures at home using inkjet or sublimation printers. And now? Can you remember the last time you printed photos? I caught myself thinking that I hadn’t printed anything for five years. The need has disappeared. Our photographs are now completely digital. We watch them on our computer monitors, post them online and thus share them with our friends.
That is why the second most important tool for a modern photographer, whether he is a professional or an ordinary amateur, after digital camera is the monitor. But not all monitors are the same. And the point here is not at all in size, although they, of course, matter. Have you noticed the fact that the same images look completely different on different monitors? Somewhere the picture looks juicy, somewhere faded, somewhere warmer, and somewhere in cold colors. In such a situation, it is almost impossible to draw a conclusion about what the image actually looks like. Moreover, if you process photos on the wrong monitor, then there is a high chance that your work will only look beautiful on your monitor. The rest will see oversaturated or, on the contrary, images with a color balance shifted in one direction or another. There is only one way out of this situation - using the right monitor. To date, the best monitors for working with color have been and are monitors with cathode ray tubes. But their era has passed. The time of laser monitors has not yet come, so we have to choose monitors with an LCD matrix.
So, what characteristics should such a monitor have?
1. Matrix type. There are several types of LCD matrices, differing in manufacturing technology and, as a result, in image reproduction quality. Today there are four types of matrices on the market: TN, PVA, MVA and IPS. IPS matrices are best suited for working with color. This type of LCD matrix has the most correct color rendition, but also the highest cost. Monitors with PVA and MVA matrices are less suitable for image processing. The most common cheap TN matrices are completely unsuitable.
2. Viewing angle. It should be as wide as possible. Cheap matrices have a very narrow viewing angle, and with even a slight change in the viewing angle, the image begins to darken and the colors become distorted. The ISP LCD matrix has the best viewing angle parameters.
3. Matrix surface. Despite the fashion modern trend manufacturing glossy screens, this coating option is not suitable for a monitor designed for working with images. The surface should be matte.
4. Backlight. For correct image processing, backlight uniformity is an important factor. It should be perfectly flat over the entire surface, with no highlights at the edges. LED lighting would be preferable. In this case, the monitor must reproduce deep black color, through which the matrix backlight shines through.
5. Size. Despite the fact that size is of secondary importance, its role in image processing, and especially retouching, cannot be underestimated. The most convenient range for work is 22-26 inches diagonally. The most popular is the 24-inch diagonal.
6. Color gamut. The ability of a monitor to display an expanded range of colors. Images on such monitors look richer than on conventional models. But there is a potential problem with this feature. If the main goal of the photographer is to process photographs and then post them, for example, on the Internet or transfer them to someone on digital media, then the resulting beautiful, rich picture when viewed on another monitor will look sluggish and lifeless. Therefore, calibration of monitors with extended color gamut is mandatory.
Now that we have examined the requirements for a monitor for a photographer, let’s move on to a review of those on the market modern models. We will deliberately omit models from the expensive professional segment, the prices of which are beyond 1000 euros. Let's focus on budget models of monitors, which nevertheless have very good characteristics and popular among advanced photographers.
1. ASUS PA248q
2. Dell U2412m
3. Nec MultiSync PA241w
4. HP ZR2440w
ASUS PA248q
A good functional monitor for professional work with color. It has a strict minimalist design. Compared to the previous lamp model, it has become a little thinner and more elegant. Has an attractive price. But the quality of ASUS products lately has become a controversial issue.
Specifications:
Diagonal: 24"
LCD matrix type: IPS
Resolution: 1920x1200
Response time: 6ms
Brightness: 300 cd/m2
Contrast: 1000:1/80000000:1
Viewing Angles: 178°/178°
Cost: 16,000 - 18,000 rubles
Advantages:
Quality materials and precise assembly
Convenient control
Fast Matrix
94.9% sRGB color gamut
USB hub with 4 outputs supporting USB 3.0 standard
Flaws:
High brightness even at minimum settings
Matte matrix with strong crystalline effect
Problems with uneven backlighting on dark backgrounds
DELL U2412m
A new product from DELL, which consistently produces consistently high-quality products. The presented model is characterized, first of all, by its inexpensive cost, which became possible thanks to the use of an economical e-ISP matrix from LG.Display.
Specifications:
Diagonal: 24"
LCD matrix type: e-IPS
Resolution: 1920x1200
Response time: 8ms
Brightness: 300 cd/m2
Viewing Angles: 178°/178°
Cost: 13,000 - 15,000 rubles
Advantages:
Stylish modern design
Very comfortable ergonomic stand
96.4% sRGB color gamut
Good color rendering at factory settings
Low price
Fast Matrix
Wide brightness range
Flaws:
Poor backlight uniformity
Backlight flickering
Noticeable crystalline effect
Nec MultiSync PA241w
The most expensive model presented in this review. The professional series of NEC monitors, to which this model also belongs, are practically not inferior to the products of such famous companies as Eizo and LaCie. This monitor is based on a P-ISP matrix from the same company LG.Display. The same matrix, for example, is used in DELL U2410 monitors.
Specifications:
Diagonal: 24"
LCD matrix type: P-IPS
Resolution: 1920x1200
Response time: 8ms
Brightness: 360 cd/m2
Contrast: 1000:1
Viewing Angles: 178°/178°
Cost: 34,000 - 36,000 rubles
Advantages:
Quality materials
Light sensor
Great possibilities for fine-tuning the monitor
Ergonomic stand
Mild crystalline effect
Fast Matrix
Functional software included
Perfectly tuned sRGB mode
Black level adjustable
Wide range of brightness adjustment
Flaws:
Very high price compared to competitors
High frequency hum during operation
Highlighted corners on a black background
Poor emulation of color standards
High power consumption
No HDMI
HP ZR2440w
This monitor model is a direct competitor to the DELL U2412m, since it is built on exactly the same e-IPS matrix. The difference is only in a higher brightness limit and appearance. It is also important that HP products are traditionally represented in Russia good service and good software.
Specifications:
Diagonal: 24"
LCD matrix type: e-IPS
Resolution: 1920x1200
Response time: 6ms
Brightness: 350 cd/m2
Contrast: 1000:1/2000000:1
Viewing Angles: 178°/178°
Cost: 18,000 - 21,000 rubles
Advantages:
Stylish case made of quality materials
High quality color rendering without additional settings
High matrix speed
Wide range of matrix adjustment without loss of contrast
Ergonomic stand
Convenient menu
Low crystal effect
No extraneous noise during operation
Flaws:
Relatively high price
Pseudo-eight-bit matrix
93.6% sRGB compliance
Conclusions:
The presented models have extremely similar technical specifications, due to the use by manufacturers of a virtually identical LCD matrix produced by LG.Display. The only exception is the NEC monitor with a slightly different matrix, but still the same LG. The choice of 24-inch monitor models is extremely small and you have to choose based on brand preferences, wallet size and taste preferences. I hope this article will at least partially help in this choice.
Stay connected!
It's no secret that Apple equipment is often chosen for working with graphics, photos and videos. Designers, planners and engineers often come to meetings with MacBooks of all models and generations. However, show the customer samples and examples ready-made solutions at a meeting is one thing, but getting down to work at home or in the office is quite another.
A 13 or 15-inch laptop screen is no longer suitable for this; even a Retina display with such a diagonal does not allow you to work comfortably. An external monitor will come to the rescue.
Let's figure out together how not to make mistakes when choosing from the wide variety of displays on the market.
Color rendition
The most important requirement of a professional for a monitor. If the gamer experiences the not-so-natural color of blood that gushes from enemies, then the designer may find himself in an unpleasant situation when the colors of the layout looked perfect, but after printing it turned out something awkward.
When choosing, you should pay attention to the display percentage of the Adobe RGB color field. Models for design and engineering must display at least 99% of this spectrum and be capable of hardware calibration.
This way, any monitor owner can independently adjust the image to achieve maximum similarity between the colors on the screen and the real ones.
What to choose: By this criterion there is no equal to the LG 32UD99-W model. The model was presented at CES 2017 and will go on sale in a month.
Diagonal and resolution
These parameters need to be considered together. Only the correct ratio of screen diagonal and supported resolution will allow you to work productively with the monitor.
Currently there are models with resolution Ultra-High-Definition (UHD), they can output up to 3840 x 2160 pixels. They are followed Wide-Quad HD (WQHD) models with a resolution of 2,560 x 1,440 pixels. Such models will cost more than regular ones Full HD monitors with a resolution of 1,920 x 1,080, but the convenience and accuracy of work with a higher resolution will be higher.
When choosing UHD or WQHD, you should take a closer look at displays with a diagonal of 27 inches, and it is better to choose 32-inch matrices. Only on this screen area can you easily set the maximum resolution so that other interface elements do not become microscopic.
Chinese electronics manufacturers are now guilty of this: they add cosmic resolution to 22-24 inch models, and when set to the maximum, it is impossible to even notice the cursor.
Connectivity
Ideally, a designer's monitor should have the following connectors: HDMI, DisplayPort/Thunderbolt, and the new USB-C. Such a variety of ports will allow you not to worry when choosing a laptop or computer model. We managed to connect everything from the old system unit to the new one MacBook Pro 2016.
The life cycle of a good monitor is much longer than that of modern computers. It is enough to choose the right screen once and it will easily outlive a couple of work laptops.
What to choose: The most sophisticated monitor in terms of connectivity options is LG 38UC99.
Ergonomics
The monitor should not only be able to display colors correctly, but also be convenient for everyday use. The stand should allow you to change the angle of the matrix and set the appropriate display height.
Otherwise, you will have to constantly put something under the monitor leg. This solution looks poor, and there is also a risk of the entire structure toppling over.
Photographers and designers will also appreciate the ability to rotate the monitor 90 degrees. This makes it convenient to edit portrait photos or projects with vertical orientation.
Literally 10–15 years ago, every photographer faced a painful choice in the process of taking a picture. It began with determining the type of film and ended only with the process of developing the photograph: the selection of photochemistry, developers, attenuators, light filters, photo enlargers, photo glossers, and even a red lamp for the “black room.” In our time, this choice remains just as painful and languid. Only the objects have changed - now there are many more of them, and they have become digital. This is not about choosing photographic equipment and accessories. I want to talk about choosing components for a computer that will be optimal for working with digital photography.
With this article I will begin the series of materials “Computer for the Photographer”. And the first topic of our series will be choosing a monitor.
The monitor is your eyes. When choosing a monitor for working with photography, it is very important to take into account its characteristics, because the end result your work (the combination of color and light of the picture that you want to show). A photographer, like any creative person, completely relies on his feelings. Just as a musician trusts his ears, a photographer relies on his eyes. To my own eyes. His main task- convey to others what he saw through the camera lens, preserving all the colors and moods of the plot.
What should be the ideal monitor for a photographer? To answer this question, let's define the basic requirements. Firstly, the monitor matrix should support the sRGB color gamut as much as possible (we'll talk about this below). Secondly, the monitor must have an IPS matrix installed. When choosing a monitor, you also need to consider the size, viewing angle, type of surface and screen backlight. Let's take a closer look at each characteristic.
Matrix type
The matrix is the heart of the monitor. When choosing a computer monitor, you are essentially choosing a matrix. Almost all other characteristics of the monitor depend on this choice. Let's look at the types of liquid crystal matrices.
Today, the main manufacturing technologies for LCD displays are TN, IPS and MVA.
Matrix TN is the simplest, but it has the highest response time (that is, the image on the screen is updated relatively quickly). In the past they were quite widespread. TN matrices are the cheapest. The advantages of this technology end there. Matrices of this type are characterized by certain disadvantages: small viewing angles, low contrast, poor color rendering and the inability to obtain perfect black color. The last point is especially critical when working with photographs. You will never be able to tell the difference between a failed shadow and just a dark area.
LCD monitor matrix made using technology IPS(also known as SFT), is currently the only sensor capable of delivering full sRGB color depth at all times. An undeniable advantage of this technology is the wide viewing angles, reaching 140°. Based on this technology, there are already a number of improvements called H-IPS, AS-IPS, AFFS, etc. For example, H-IPS technology is superior to IPS with reduced response time and increased contrast levels. With the advent of AFFS technology, the viewing angle and brightness have increased. This technology is now used in the manufacture of tablet PCs and smartphones. Each display manufacturing company (NEC, Hitachi, LG, etc.) improves modifications of IPS matrices every year, allowing them to improve the performance of monitors.
Technology MVA(multi-domain vertical alignment), developed by Fujitsu, was a compromise between TN and IPS technologies. The advantages of MVA technology are deep black color (high contrast), and not gray, as in TN matrices, and wide viewing angles (up to 170°). The disadvantages are the loss of detail in the shadows and the dependence of the color balance of the image on the viewing angle. This technology also has several modifications: PVA from Samsung, MVA-Premium, etc.
However, even now there is professional photographers, which work with legacy CRT monitors. And all because there are still very few affordable LCD monitors that can compete in image quality with a kinescope.
Color gamut and number of colors
Perhaps this is the most important parameter of a monitor if it is designed to work with color. Sometimes there is confusion with the concepts of “color gamut” and “number of colors.” Most often, these characteristics are presented in the description of the monitor (usually 16.2 or 16.7 million). Color gamut and number of colors are two complementary things: color gamut determines what range of colors the monitor can display, and the “number of colors” parameter determines how many gradations it can break this range into to reflect intermediate shades and midtones. Color gamut is a hardware characteristic of a monitor: on a monitor with a larger color gamut, you can get purer, more saturated colors.
The “number of colors” parameter determines the difference between two adjacent colors - than more quantity colors, the smaller the difference. The entire space of colors reproduced by the monitor is divided into 16.2 or 16.7 million gradations. We can set a specific color only up to a specific color gradation. Accordingly, if this space (color gamut) increases, but the number of gradations (colors) remains the same, then the difference between two adjacent colors inevitably increases. It turns out that, on the one hand, a monitor with a large color gamut can show more colors in the physical sense of the word, but, on the other hand, it does so less accurately. In practice, such a lack of the number of colors is noticeable on smooth gradients: transverse stripes appear on them, each of which corresponds to one gradation. This effect can be seen by stretching, say, a gradient from red to black across the entire screen: you will see narrow, uniform transverse stripes on it even on the best LCD monitor. The only possible solution is to increase the color bit depth to 30 bits (so that each of the three components is allocated 10 bits). On at the moment only a few monitors can work with 30-bit color. Their cost is from 100,000 rubles. For example, NEC SpectraView Reference 2180WG LED.
Let's return to the color gamut. To visually describe the range of reproducible colors, a diagram is used in which a horseshoe-shaped figure depicts the entire range of colors accessible to human vision. Along the edges of this figure there are pure colors, and when approaching the center they mix, ultimately forming a point of white.
Images on monitors with an extended color range look richer than on regular models. Therefore, calibration of monitors with extended color gamut is mandatory. They are unlikely to be suitable for amateur use in the “plug and play” style.
Contrast and Brightness
Monitor contrast is expressed as the ratio between the maximum and minimum brightness on a white and black background, respectively. Brightness is one of strengths LCD monitor. This is the amount of light emitted by the display. If the brightness of the monitor is high enough, this is necessarily indicated in advertising brochures as one of the main advantages of the monitor. But sometimes the technical characteristics of the monitor do not coincide with the real ones. This also applies to brightness. If you can’t rely on the monitor’s specifications, then how can you evaluate its brightness? It is best to turn on the monitor and set its contrast and brightness to maximum. If in this case the image turns out to be too bright and for comfortable work you will need to reduce the brightness, then we can confidently say that the monitor’s brightness reserve is quite sufficient.
Viewing angle
The maximum vertical or horizontal viewing angle is defined as the angle from which the image contrast is at least 10:1. And image contrast refers to the ratio of maximum brightness on a white background to minimum brightness on a black background.
An important circumstance for a photographer is the fact that when viewing an image at an angle to the monitor surface, it is not a drop in contrast that occurs, but color distortions. For example, red turns into yellow, and green turns into blue. At the same time, such distortions in different models manifest themselves in different ways, and in some cases they are noticeable even at a small angle, which is much smaller than the viewing angle. Therefore, it is fundamentally wrong to compare monitors based on viewing angles. More precisely, you can compare, but practical significance there is no such comparison.
Thus, the viewing angle should strive to be as wide as possible. Cheap matrices have a very narrow viewing angle, and with even a slight change in the viewing angle, the image begins to darken and the colors become distorted. The ISP LCD matrix has the best viewing angle parameters.
A good example of a monitor for photo editing is the NEC MultiSync PA241W. This is a 24-inch TFT P-IPS monitor with a screen contrast of 1000:1 and a viewing angle of 178°. This monitor is capable of displaying more than 1 billion colors.
Screen surface
And here everything is not so simple. The screen surface is very important characteristic. There are two types: matte and glossy.
The glossy surface of the monitor is less convenient for work, since all light sources and illuminated objects located in front of the screen and behind the back of the person working at the computer are reflected on it. Reflections greatly interfere when working with photography; you often have to strain your eyes and peer into the picture. But glossy displays are “brighter”; they have richer, more intense and contrasting color reproduction, and display deep blacks well. These are the advantages.
Matte surfaces do not have a reflective effect. They are more convenient to use, although the picture on them looks a little “poorer”. But this applies not so much to working with graphics, but to working on a computer in general.
Monitor size (diagonal) and resolution
This is precisely the parameter where the principle “the more the better” does not work. And even harms. Why? Let's figure it out.
Firstly, the larger the monitor, the higher resolution it needs. As a result, this is a load on the video card. If we purchase a more powerful video card, this increases the total cost of the computer. Secondly, you don’t need a large monitor for processing. When working, a photographer always enlarges a photograph by 300–500%. This makes it easier to correct minor defects. Accordingly, why do you need a large monitor if in any case you have to enlarge the photo? However, there’s no need to waste time on trifles... For comfortable work, a 24- or 27-inch monitor with a screen resolution of 1920x1200 and 2560x1440, respectively, is enough. And if you really want it and your budget allows you to purchase a powerful video card (or even two in SLI mode), then you can use a 30-inch monitor with a resolution of 2560x1600. For example, this monitor may be the HP ZR30w.
IPS matrices are best suited for working with color. This type of LCD matrix has the most correct color rendition, but also a higher cost. Monitors with PVA and MVA matrices are less suitable for image processing. The fairly common cheap TN matrices are completely unsuitable. The recommended screen size is at least 24 inches. If you are going to use the monitor in a brightly lit room or in front of a window, a monitor with a matte screen is optimal. But you can curtain the window, turn off the lights, and enjoy a rich and natural picture from the glossy screen of your monitor.
To make things easier to understand, I've divided our recommended monitors into two subcategories: regular and professional. If you are a beginner and are not yet well versed in color and color calibration, your absolute choice is a regular monitor. When choosing a regular LCD monitor for photography, stick to the specifications in the previous paragraph. The manufacturer is not so critical. This could be a device from Samsung, LG, Asus, Dell, etc.
Choosing a professional monitor is quite difficult. These are monitors from NEC, QUATO, EIZO, etc. For comfortable work, entry-level models in this segment (for example, NEC Multisync PA241W or NEC Multisync LCD 2490WUXI2) are suitable. Some professional monitors have a built-in calibrator (for example, the Eizo ColorEdge CG276W model costs about 170,000 rubles). And the flagship monitor from NEC Display Solutions is the NEC SpectraView Reference 302. Thanks to its impressive dimensions (30 inches), high resolution(2560x1600, 16:10) and excellent image uniformity, this monitor is ideal for the most demanding applications (prepress and viewing printed forms on the screen, as well as for obtaining images from professional quality color rendering). The average price of this monitor is 178,000 rubles.
As you can see, there is a choice for every budget. The main thing is to use it correctly and choose a monitor that meets the requirements for high-quality work with photography. Now you can do it without much effort.
Having professional design equipment is an important condition for creating quality products, so in this article we will pay attention to the issue of choosing a monitor.
What are the differences from regular monitors?
A monitor is an indispensable tool for creating high-quality images, in particular, it is indispensable for designers.
What should this device be like if you need to work with Photoshop every day?
Of course, it’s functional, it’s normal to convey colors, their depth, and most importantly, it displays well natural look pictures.
Thanks to this device, it is possible to do retouching and color correction, develop a menu and template for a particular portal.
Simply put, your screen is responsible for creating every visual element.
It is very important to choose a multifunctional model that meets all your requirements.
At the same time, of course, it should not be incredibly expensive.
True, you shouldn’t rush to old models with an electro-ray tube.
They have insufficient light transmission, so the image may differ significantly from what was intended.
This fact is the main disadvantage.
Among the main precautions when purchasing is that a monitor for designers should not tire the eyes, because a specialist will spend a lot of time on it.
Let's try to make sense of a complex world computer equipment and determine which monitor is ideal and best suited.
General rules for choosing a quality monitor
When looking through the catalog, it is important to take into account all the nuances.
The monitor affects not only the process of completing tasks, but also the condition of your body, including the health of your visual organs.
What to consider when choosing first:
- LCD or CRT. Some people believe that the quality of all LCD screens is an order of magnitude higher than that of CRTs. Don't be so categorical! In fact, some CRTs produce very good color saturation and have a high viewing angle. There is no need to blindly follow the trend and buy the first LCD you come across, giving it preference over CRT.
- Gloss or matte. It is best to polish photos in graphic editors on matte monitors. In most cases, glossy ones will serve you badly - instead of an image, you will look into some kind of mirror
- Size - This parameter plays an important role, but this in no way means that you need the largest display. Working on huge screens is like editing in a movie theater, sitting in the front row - there is no way to take in the whole picture. It’s better to visit a computer hardware store, find out basic information from consultants, carefully inspect the devices and select optimal size for yourself. A thoughtful purchase will last you longer.
- Matrix type. If your choice falls on an LCD display, it is worth considering that they are divided by type and come in several types. Basically, they differ from each other only in some features.
These points play a very important role when purchasing a monitor for a designer.
Types of matrix of liquid crystal screens:
- TN is perhaps the most common type. Pros: low cost, quick transition from white to black. There are also disadvantages: incorrect color reproduction when changing the viewing angle, 6-bit color scheme.
- MVA - like the previous one, is a fairly budget type. The advantages are: short response time, larger viewing angle, excellent contrast. Among the disadvantages is a rather low level of color rendering.
- PVA are a modification of the previous type from Samsung. The advantages remain the same, but the price has decreased significantly.
- IPS are the leaders of the selection. They stand out with a wide viewing angle and smooth color changes. They are considered one of the most profitable for design work.
Let's move from theory to a review of specific examples that will help you choose the ideal device for permanent job with editing programs. Below are popular models and their main characteristics.
Dell 2412M
Combines best qualities, which a monitor for a designer should have . The Dell 2412M is stylish, smart and functional.
Characteristics
- Size - 24 inches.
- Resolution - 1920×
- Matrix - e-IPS (improved version of standard IPS).
- Brightness - 300 cd/m2
- Viewing angles - 170°.
- Contrast - 1000:1.
- Screen refresh rate - 60 Hz.
- Energy consumption during operation is 38 W.
- Power consumption in standby mode is 0.50 W.
The following connectors are available:
- USB connections between the monitor’s USB hub and a computer;
- VGA (D-SUB) for video card;
- DVI-D;
- DisplayPort;
- Power connector for DELL speakers;
- Power connector 220 V.
On the left side of the Dell 2412M there are two USB connectors. Other holes are located at the bottom, which makes it convenient to connect all kinds of cables to them.
Considering the presence of so many connectors, there should be no problems connecting additional devices.
Now let's move on to more detailed characteristics.
Design Features
The Dell 2412M monitor is made of smooth, matte plastic (see image).
The peculiarities of the material make it not particularly easily soiled: fingerprints and dust will not be visible to the naked eye.
In addition, the case is practically scratch-free, which greatly simplifies maintenance.
The tall, rear-facing stand is adjustable - you can even fit medium-sized speakers.
The control keys are located on the lower right panel.
The device rotates to a vertical position - this feature will be useful for specialists who often take on complex projects.
Image quality
The Dell U2412M monitor belongs to the Ultra Sharp category. This means excellent image reproduction, which is one of the most important criteria for designers.
Monitor settings
The buttons are not labeled - pressing any one brings up a detailed menu on the screen.
Using a combination of the appropriate keys, you can change all the necessary parameters, including brightness and contrast.
The Dell U2412M monitor is suitable for working with graphic design and is very convenient for specialized use. He has high quality pictures, and it also reproduces colors well.
LG 29UM65-P
Monitor LG 29UM65-P
LG 29UM65-P has gained traction in the market due to its useful features.
Characteristics
- Screen size - 29 inches;
- Resolution - 2560x1080;
- Matrix - AH-IPS;
- Brightness indicator - 300 cd/m2;
- Number of colors - 16.7 million;
- Contrast - 1000:1.
Availability of inputs:
2 x HDMI - 19 pin HDMI Type A, 1 x headphones - mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm.
Appearance
LG 29UM65-P is quite typical for representatives of this brand - it is made in a frameless format.
The device looks modest, so it will appeal to fans of minimalism.
Color rendition
The monitor reproduces colors well, but there may be excessive “warmth” of shades with factory settings.
This can be easily corrected by correcting the color scheme; it will not be difficult to customize the screen to suit individual needs.
There is also a “black level” item.
Monitor settings
LG 29UM65-P is controlled by a five-way joystick, which is located in the center of the bottom end.
The downside is that the button is glossy and therefore slides when pressed.
Thus, the screen is quite stable and durable, but does not pretend to be ideal.
Samsung U32D970Q
The Samsung U32D970Q monitor, according to manufacturers, is a suitable tool for professionals.
Let's try to find out if this is really so.
Characteristics
- Screen size - 31.5 inches
- Resolution - 3849x2160
- Brightness indicator - 350 cd/m2
- Contrast - 1000:1
- Matrix - PLS
Availability of inputs:
- Dual DVI-D - 1.
- DisplayPort -2.
- USB - USB Type A 3.0 x 4, USB Type B 3.0 x
- HDMI - 1.
- Audio Out - 1.
Design
Model U32D970Q is made in classic strict style, but fits into almost any interior without any problems.
Color rendition
Samsung U32D970Q is capable of reproducing 1.07 billion shades.
In addition, it is equipped with support for eleven light spaces - sRGB and AdobeRGB display is guaranteed.
Peculiarities
Designers will appreciate great opportunities Screen adjustments: tilt, height, position relative to the table plane changes.
To summarize, we conclude that the Samsung U32D970Q monitor really has a lot of advantages: good color display and high accuracy.
Designers can safely choose for their professional activity.
Eizo ColorEdge CS2420
Budget option on the market professional equipment. Does this affect the quality? Let's try to figure it out.
Characteristics
- Screen size - 24 inches;
- Resolution - 1920x1200;
- Brightness indicator - 299 cd/m2;
- Contrast - 859:1.
Availability of connectors:
- USB for monitor control -1;
- USB 3.0 - 3.
As is already clear, the Eizo ColorEdge CS2420 is quite inferior in parameters to the previous Samsung model.
The main advantage of this model is its accurate color reproduction and truly stunning image reproduction, which most designers will appreciate.
The Eizo ColorEdge CS2420 monitor is adjustable in height, tilt, and, of course, rotates. It is quite convenient for everyday use.
Appearance
Eizo ColorEdge CS2420 is designed in a simple style. However, it will be a good addition to the decor of any office.
Peculiarities
The model is good for its low energy consumption. The negative is the lack of speakers.
As a result, we can call the Eizo ColorEdge CS2420 a fairly suitable purchase in its price segment.
True, you shouldn’t expect anything supernatural, since the device’s characteristics are inferior to more powerful new developments.
To complete highly complex projects, it is worth choosing a different option.
BenQ SW2700PT
BenQ SW2700PT is positioned as one of the most inexpensive solutions for graphic design.
Characteristics
- Screen size - 27 inches;
- Resolution - 2560x1440;
- Brightness indicator - 350 cd/m2;
- Contrast - 1000:1.
The model is height adjustable. In addition, you can change the angle and flip the BenQ SW2700PT into portrait mode. This is quite practical if used professionally.
Availability of connectors:
- USB 3.0 - 2;
- SD Card Reader - 1;
- 3.5 mm Audio-Out - 1;
- DVI-D - 1;
- HDMI 1.4 - 1;
- DisplayPort 1.2.
This amount is enough to connect all the necessary gadgets.
Appearance
BenQ SW2700PT looks rather standard and restrained, and is not particularly creative.
Color rendition
The monitor is capable of transmitting 1.07 billion colors, which is an excellent indicator for this class. Good color rendition is perhaps the main advantage of the BenQ SW2700PT .
The BenQ SW2700PT monitor is good purchase for use in design work.
Another significant advantage is the presence of a visor, which provides additional protection from mechanical damage and, moreover, it is quite convenient.
So, if you are looking for a professional device at a normal cost, this option will be acceptable, as it has an optimal price/quality ratio.
Conclusions
What do designers need from a monitor?
The work of a designer requires precision, care and perseverance, so professional equipment must meet high standards quality.
Choosing basic work equipment is a complex and very responsible task, especially for those who are starting their career in this field.
After analyzing five popular monitors for designers, we can draw the following conclusions:
- The type of matrix matters most. This is selection criterion No. 1.
- A high price and a huge monitor are not a guarantee of quality.
- There are normal monitors in the budget segment, for example, BenQ SW2700PT and Eizo ColorEdge CS2420.
Each of the analyzed examples has both advantages and disadvantages.
Making the final choice and deciding what is better is the buyer’s task.
The main thing is to compare several, taking into account all the pros and cons of each device.
A competent selection of components and peripherals will allow you to best meet the user's needs. Certain models of video cards, processors and monitors are suitable for the intended purposes. Of course, you can always choose a universal solution, but to achieve the best results, you should look closely at a narrow range of options.
Before purchasing a monitor, users personal computers It’s worth thinking about the tasks that he will perform.
General tips on choosing this peripheral were given in the article,
Criteria for choosing a monitor for a photographer
PC owners who plan to work with photographs have special needs and interests. Photographers and graphic designers pay attention to the following parameters when purchasing a monitor:
- Matrix type. For high-quality photo processing, it is worth buying a monitor with an IPS matrix or its improved version H-IPS (has a high response time) and AS-IPS (features increased display contrast). Devices of this kind convey colors most naturally and achieve the highest possible viewing angles (from 140 to 178°).
Photographers have special requirements for the monitor, because the work of a professional depends entirely on the image on the screen
- Contrast and brightness. The higher these indicators, the better. The first should not be lower than 250 cd/m2, and a level of 1000:1 is considered acceptable for the second.
- Screen surface. The material applied to the display is extremely important for people working with photographs. Design masters do not favor devices with glossy surfaces, because they reflect all the incident light, while matte ones absorb any rays directed at the screen.
- Color rendition. The higher the quality and quantity of flowers, the better. There are models on the market with 16.2 and 16.7 million shades - this is quite enough.
Good color rendition is important for working with photography, so the monitor must display 16.2–16.7 million shades
- Screen sizes. You should not choose a very small monitor: best options have a diagonal of 19 inches. Of course, on 40-inch screens you will be able to take in almost all the details of the image, but there is a high chance of not seeing the entire composition.
- Resolutions below Full HD are not considered by photographers. Most often the choice falls in favor of 2K and 4K.
TOP 10 best monitors for photographers
There are many interesting models of monitors on the modern market that could become good assistants for photographers in their work. Let's look at the 10 best.
LG 27UK850
LG 27UK850 - an office monitor that is suitable for photo processing
The LG 27UK850 was not initially positioned as a monitor for photographers. This is a typical expensive office device that has unexpectedly found favor among designers and soap dish fans. The device has amazing characteristics and is distinguished by its material, which allows it to be successfully used for photo processing. What sets LG apart is its deep development of the HDR effect, which is the main feature of the monitor.
Viewsonic VX3211–2K-mhd
Beginners should pay attention to the Viewsonic VX3211–2K-mhd monitor
If you are a beginner photographer, then you should take a closer look at a monitor from VIEWSONIC. Why is it good for beginners? Firstly, with all its advantages and excellent characteristics, the device is extremely cheap when compared with other representatives of the market - only 20 thousand rubles. Secondly, we have amazing color reproduction, supporting more than a billion colors, which remain natural and unique across different brightness ranges. Thirdly, if you are going to spend a long time editing photos, then the Flicker-Free function will save your eyes from overstrain and fatigue.
DELL P2418D
The DELL P2418D monitor is inexpensive, but has high image quality
The presentation of budget models continues with the DELL P2418D monitor, which has become a favorite among photographers for its ability to produce natural and detailed images. This device for a ridiculous 17 thousand rubles is perfect for both beginners and professionals, but the latter will most likely look at more expensive options. The DELL P2418D will offer consistently high image quality and excellent brightness and contrast.
DELL UltraSharp U2410
UltraSharp U2410 is another monitor from DELL, suitable for photo processing
DELL seems to have occupied the niche of inexpensive but high-quality monitors for photographers. The UltraSharp U2518D model was distinguished by standard high brightness and contrast levels. The manufacturer has prepared excellent LED backlighting and anti-glare coating on the screen for users. The device supports HDR10, which allows you to work with high dynamic ranges of colors.
ASUS MG279Q
The ASUS MG279Q monitor belongs to the middle price category - its cost exceeds 30 thousand rubles
The average price category is more diverse with models with different modes and functions. A wide range of capabilities, connection interfaces and configurations allow the user of the ASUS MG279Q to configure the monitor the way the photographer’s soul desires. The main distinguishing features of the device are high Hertz resolution, detailed WQHD resolution and support for sRGB colors.
ASUS PB248Q
PB248Q is another monitor from ASUS with characteristics suitable for photographers
An excellent monitor with flicker-free LED backlighting and Full HD resolution. ASUS PB248Q is quite simple, but it gets the job done: it is suitable for photographers because it has 178° viewing angles and 100% sRGB coverage. In some ways, this model resembles the previous one on the list, which was also produced by ASUS, but here users can save money and buy a good monitor for photo processing for 24 thousand rubles.
NEC MultiSync EA275WMi
The NEC MultiSync EA275WMi monitor costs more than 40 thousand rubles, but still belongs to the middle price category
More expensive devices immediately announce their cool characteristics: NEC MultiSync EA275WMi is equipped with an excellent, bright 27-inch IPS display with 2K resolution. In addition, compared to mid- and low-budget monitors, it can boast an increased brightness of 350 cd/m2. The contrast is at the standard level of 1000:1. For those who like to edit photos with music, MultiSync has built-in high-quality speakers. You will have to pay about 42 thousand rubles for such a device.
NEC SpectraView 241
NEC SpectraView 241 - monitor for professionals
A monitor for true professionals in their field. Only the best of the best use the NEC SpectraView 241 in their work. This device immediately stands out as interesting. appearance, because many will ask the question: “What function does this strange visor perform?” Believe me, photography masters find many uses for this interesting gadget, from holding photos to limiting the incidence of light on the display. Professionals highlight excellent color reproduction and deep tones in the NEC SpectraView 241, but you will have to pay 240 thousand rubles for this monitor.
Eizo ColorEdge CG248–4K
The Eizo ColorEdge CG248–4K monitor is preferred by many professional photographers
Less expensive compared to the previous one, but much more interesting, the Eizo ColorEdge CG248-4K has impressive characteristics: a very high-quality 23.8-inch display that conveys natural colors, a resolution of 3840x2160 and stunning viewing angles of 178° on each side . This professional monitor will cost the user 190 thousand rubles.
For people working with photos, Eizo has long been the main supplier of top-end devices.
iMac 27
iMac 27 is not just a monitor, but a candy bar that has everything for photo processing
Apple equipment is in demand among amateurs and professionals working with video and photos. The iMac 27 is not just a monitor, but an entire all-in-one. You don’t have to spend money on other components, because inside this device there is already everything a photographer needs to carry out any operations on photographs. Yes, the device from Apple is not cheap, but it fully justifies its cost of 130 thousand rubles. For this money you get a 27-inch screen with Full HD resolution, a high-quality IPS matrix with a glossy finish and a built-in AMD Radeon Pro 500 video processor.
Table: comparison of the best monitors for photo processing
| Monitor | Diagonal in inches | Permission | Matrix type | Brightness and Contrast | Price in rubles |
| LG 27UK850 | 27 | 3840×2160 | IPS | 450 cd/m2 1000:1 | 34 000 |
| Viewsonic VX3211–2K-mhd | 31,5 | 2560×1440 | IPS | 250 cd/m2 1200:1 | 20 000 |
| DELL P2418D | 23,8 | 2560×1440 | IPS | 300 cd/m2 1000:1 | 17 000 |
| DELL UltraSharp U2410 | 25 | 2560×1440 | IPS | 350 cd/m2 1000:1 | 24 000 |
| ASUS MG279Q | 27 | 2560×1440 | IPS | 350 cd/m2 1000:1 | 37 000 |
| ASUS PB248Q | 24 | 1920×1080 | IPS | 250 cd/m2 1000:1 | 24 000 |
| NEC MultiSync EA275WMi | 27 | 2560×1440 | IPS | 350 cd/m2 1000:1 | 42 000 |
| NEC SpectraView 241 | 24,1 | 1920×1200 | IPS | 360 cd/m2 1000:1 | 240 000 |
| Eizo ColorEdge CG248–4K | 23,8 | 3840×2160 | IPS | 350 cd/m2 1000:1 | 190 000 |
| iMac 27 | 27 | 1920x1080 | IPS | 500 cd/m2 1200:1 | 130 000 |
Manufacturers offer monitors for photo processing in different price categories. When buying a device, focus on your needs.
Perhaps among our readers there will be real photographers who will share their opinions regarding the use of monitors in work. Be sure to leave comments and tell us which devices you prefer.
Loading...
